DEI and the Rise of Ideological Tyranny During the Biden Years

 

In the aftermath of George Floyd’s death, large-scale protests using slogans and manufactured concepts such as “systemic racism” prompted many major U.S. corporations to rapidly adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, embedding DEI goals into hiring, promotion, and retention policies.

These programs were framed as responses to public pressure and moral urgency, positioning DEI as both a social responsibility and a corporate priority. Over time, however, DEI moved beyond equal opportunity into ideological enforcement and introduced a new vocabulary that reinforced a specific political framing. Between 2014 and 2020, a series of slogans and manufactured concepts entered widespread use and were incorporated into mandatory training programs, corporate communications, and academic requirements.

Slogans such as “Black Lives Matter,” which became widespread after Ferguson, “Defund the Police,” “Believe All Women,” “Silence Is Violence,” “Say Their Names,” “No Justice, No Peace,” and “The Future Is Female” evolved from protest rhetoric into enforced speech norms. Corporations placed these slogans on their websites and in official communications to signal compliance and moral alignment, while companies and individuals who refused were often marginalized, ostracized, or professionally disadvantaged.

At the same time, a parallel set of manufactured concepts reshaped everyday language and institutional policy. Terms such as white privilege, white fragility, unconscious or implicit bias, microaggressions, intersectionality, positionality, racial humility, and systemic racism were embedded into workplace and academic life.

Other concepts, including anti-racism redefined as active ideological participation, cultural appropriation with an expanded scope, lived experience elevated above objective evidence, whiteness treated as a distinct moral category, and acronyms such as BIPOC, further codified the framework.

Language surrounding allyship, decolonization, centering marginalized voices, safe and brave spaces, trigger warnings, emotional labor, tone policing, and settler colonialism migrated from activist and academic contexts into corporate policy and professional evaluation. Together, these slogans and concepts functioned as compelled speech, shaping acceptable belief and expression within institutions.

Given so many slogans, concepts, and vocabulary, corporations needed to hire people to ensure that these agendas were being enforced. Chief diversity officer positions grew by 168.9 percent between 2019 and 2022. DEI job openings increased 55 percent in the first three months after Floyd’s death, and DEI-related positions rose 60 percent nationwide by 2020. NPR reported that 78 percent of its 2021 new hires were non-white. Condé Nast reported that in 2021 only 25 percent of new hires were male and 49 percent were white. Vox Media shifted from being 82 percent male and 88 percent white in 2013 to 37 percent male and 59 percent white by 2022. At the Los Angeles Times, only 7.7 percent of interns hired since 2020 were white men.

These changes were accompanied by restrictive policies and systemic injustices. Training programs compelled ideological conformity, with employees required to attend sessions teaching that they were inherently racist based on skin color and that America was systemically racist. Acceptance of concepts such as white privilege and racial guilt was often mandatory. Critics argue that such programs created hostile work environments for white employees.

Multiple legal challenges followed. At Pennsylvania State University, a white male professor sued over training that attacked race neutrality, equal opportunity, colorblindness, and merit. In Diemert v. City of Seattle, a former employee claimed diversity initiatives created a hostile work environment. In another case involving a Washington medical center, an employee alleged termination for failing to adhere to race-conscious DEI principles.

Documented hiring practices reinforced these claims. Wells Fargo was accused of conducting sham interviews with diverse candidates for positions that had already been filled, leading to shareholder lawsuits. The NFL faced accusations of conducting fake interviews with minority candidates. Disney’s Writing Program awarded 107 writing fellowships and 17 directing fellowships without a single award going to a white man.

Hiring managers quoted in multiple accounts stated openly that they were not hiring the best candidate and that excluding white men was routine. University hiring statistics in California reflected similar patterns. Since 2020, UC Irvine hired three white men out of 64 tenure-track positions. UC Santa Cruz hired two white men out of 59 humanities positions. Brown University hired three white American men out of 45 humanities and social sciences positions since 2022.

Racial segregation also expanded through the use of affinity groups. Conservative critics documented mandatory segregated training sessions organized by race and “whiteness accountability” groups required for white employees. At Stanford University, Jewish staff reported pressure to join whiteness accountability groups, effectively erasing Jewish identity by categorizing them solely as white. At the federal level, the Trump administration responded in September 2020 with Executive Order 13950.

The order banned federal agencies and contractors from conducting training involving “divisive concepts,” including teachings that one race is inherently superior, that individuals are inherently racist or sexist based on race or sex, that moral character is determined by race, or that merit and hard work are racist concepts. Enforcement mechanisms included the threat of contract termination and a hotline operated by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Contractors were required to certify compliance or risk losing federal funding.

The Biden administration immediately rescinded the order. Federal DEI requirements were expanded, and diversity officers were required across federal agencies.

Corporate environments increasingly restricted speech. Employees reported fear of questioning DEI policies, citing termination, blacklisting, public shaming, and career destruction. In Savage’s reporting, every interviewee demanded anonymity, fearing being labeled racist. Questioning diversity metrics became grounds for professional retaliation, and self-censorship became standard.

Meritocracy was abandoned in favor of explicit racial targeting that, while unofficial, was enforced in practice. Diversity was prioritized over qualifications, and white applicants were automatically disadvantaged. Procurement and supplier mandates reinforced the same framework. Retailers faced pressure to adopt policies such as the “15 Percent Pledge,” allocating shelf space to Black-owned businesses. Supplier diversity requirements expanded, with non-diverse suppliers increasingly excluded.

Education systems reflected similar patterns. K–12 schools and universities implemented mandatory courses on systemic racism and required students to acknowledge white privilege. In some cases, grading was influenced by adherence to ideological positions. States such as California and Washington enacted laws mandating diversity reporting, LGBTQ+ curricula, and other identity-based requirements.

These policies produced economic, social, and cultural harms. Institutions declined in quality, media trust eroded, and decision-making shifted from merit to race. Racial division increased, young men were excluded from career paths, family formation was delayed, and mental health crises intensified. Colorblindness was abandoned in favor of explicit racial consciousness, individual rights were weakened, and group identity replaced merit.

Corporations also engaged in performative actions, including mandated Black Lives Matter statements, black squares on social media, rainbow logos during Pride month, land acknowledgments, preferred pronouns in email signatures, and product rebranding campaigns affecting long-standing brands and media content.

These developments constitute violations of civil rights law, compelled ideological speech, collective guilt imposed on individuals, career destruction based on immutable characteristics, institutional corruption, and social engineering. The George Floyd moment triggered a moral panic that led to institutional overreach, discrimination against white Americans, particularly men, and long-term institutional decline.

The post DEI and the Rise of Ideological Tyranny During the Biden Years appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.